Print PDFTable Of ContentsNext Page

Breeding for Abiotic Stress Resistance: Challenges and Opportunities

Eduardo Blumwald1, Anil Grover2 and Allen G. Good3

1Dept of Pomology, University of California One Shields Ave, Davis, CA, USA 95616

Dept of Pomology, University of California One Shields Ave, Davis, CA, USA 95616

Permanent address: Department of Plant Molecular Biology, University of Delhi South Campus, Benito Juarez Road,
New Delhi 110021, India)
Arcadia Biosciences Suite 200, 202 Cousteau Pl., Davis, CA95616, USA
Permanent Address: Department of Biological Sciences University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada, T6G 2E9


Recent experimentation with transgenic plants has led to increased salinity tolerance, with emphasis on the areas of ion homeostasis, osmotic regulation and antioxidant protection. A case study of the major challenges and opportunities to improve stress tolerance in plants using salinity is presented. As different abiotic stresses are inter-related (e.g. salinity and osmotic stress), our ability to improve crop performance may well be determined by combining different, apparently unrelated approaches for introducing several stress tolerance mechanisms into specific crop plants.


Soil salinity is one of the major abiotic stresses reducing agricultural productivity (Boyer, 1982). The levels of salt inimical to plant growth affect large terrestrial areas of the world. It is estimated that more than a third of all of the irrigated land in the world is presently affected by salinity. This is exclusive of the regions classified as arid and desert lands (which comprise 25% of the total land of our planet). The loss of farmable land due to salinization is directly in conflict with the needs of the world population which is projected to increase by 1.5 billion in the next 20 years. The damaging effects of salt accumulation in agricultural soils have influenced ancient and modern civilizations. Although famine in the world nowadays is a complex problem and often not the direct result of an insufficient production of food, there is no doubt that the gains in food production provided by the “Green Revolution” have reached the ceiling. Therefore, increasing the yield of crop plants in optimal soils and in less productive lands, including salinized lands, is essential for feeding the world.

The need to produce stress tolerant crops was evident even in ancient times (Jacobsen and Adams, 1958). However, efforts to improve crop performance under environmental stresses have not been much fruitful because the fundamental mechanisms of stress tolerance in plants remain to be completely understood. Epstein et al. (1980) described technical and biological constraints to the problem of salinity. While there appears more success with the technical solutions to the problem, the biological solutions have been more difficult to develop. For the biological approach in raising salt tolerance to work, identification of the genetic basis of stress tolerance and using the requisite salt stress tolerance related genes or QTL (Quantitative Trail Loci) to develop varieties with enhanced salinity tolerance are a pre-requisite. The existence of salt-tolerant halophytes and differences in salt tolerance between genotypes within salt-sensitive glycophytes species clearly indicates that there is a genetic basis to salt response. While varietal differences in salt tolerance have been known since the 1930s (Epstein, 1977, 1983) and intra-specific selection for salt tolerance reported in rice (Akbar and Yabuno, 1977) and barley (Epstein et al., 1980), there exists still a large gap in our understanding. Flowers and Yeo (1995) reviewed the evidence for the paucity of salt-tolerant cultivars and concluded that the number was likely to be fewer than 30. Since 1993, there have been just three registrations of salt-resistant cultivars in Crop Science (Owen et al., 1994; Al-Doss and Smith, 1998; Dierig et al., 2001).

Two basic genetical approaches currently being utilized to improve stress tolerance include: (1) exploitation of natural genetic variations, either through direct selection in stressful environments or through the mapping of QTLs and subsequent marker-assisted selection and (2) generation of transgenic plants to introduce novel genes or alter expression levels of the existing genes to affect the degree of salt stress tolerance. We discuss these approaches in somewhat detail, focusing on the recent experimentation with transgenic plants that has led to increased salinity tolerance, with emphasis on the areas of ion homeostasis, osmotic regulation and antioxidant protection. There is an emerging body of work in the area of signaling and transcriptional control that has been recently reviewed (Hasegawa et al, 2000; Zhu, 2001, 2002) and thus will not be dealt with here. Finally, we will outline some of the major challenges and opportunities to improve stress tolerance in plants using salinity as a case study. As different abiotic stresses are inter-related (e.g. salinity and osmotic stress), our ability to improve crop performance may well be determined by combining different, apparently unrelated approaches for introducing several stress tolerance mechanisms into specific crop plants.

Genetics of salt tolerance

Tomato has been a valuable species to analyze the genetic basis of salinity tolerance because making successful crosses between wild and cultivated tomato plants are relatively simple. Lyon (1941) made one of the first attempts to evaluate the inheritance of salt tolerance. An interspecific cross of Lycopersicon esculentum and L. pimpinellifolium showed that the fruit yield of the hybrid was more sensitive to increasing salt (Na2SO4) than either parent. Other crosses of wild and cultivated tomato also suggested a complex genetics. Heterosis was apparent under saline (NaCl) conditions in the elongation of stems in hybrids of L. esculentum produced with three wild species (L. cheesmanii, L. peruvianum, and L. pennellii =Solanum pennellii) (Tal and Shannon, 1983). Stem elongation was a dominant trait in hybrids with S. pennellii, but not with L. cheesmanii as the parent. Total dry matter production of another F1 hybrid between L. esculentum and L. pennellii showed hybrid vigour under saline conditions (Saranga et al., 1991).

Analysis of other plant species has also suggested that the genetics of salt tolerance is complex. In rice, sterility, an important factor in yield under saline conditions, is determined by at least three genes (Akbar et al., 1972; Akbar and Yabuno, 1977). In a genetic analysis the effects of salinity on the seedling stage and on sterility suggested both additive and dominance effects, some with high heritability (Moeljopawiro and Ikehashi, 1981; Akbar et al., 1986). The evidence of dominance of tolerance is also seen with pigenopea (Cajanus cajan), where a cross with Atylosia albicans (a salt-tolerant relatives of pigeonpea) produced intergeneric hybrids that were as salt tolerant as the wild parent, indicating that dry weight production was determined by a dominant genetic factor (Subbarao et al., 1990). There is also evidence of dominance in the salt tolerance of sorghum. Diallel analysis, based on assessing root tolerance to NaCl in salt-treated as compared with control plants, showed that there were both additive and dominance effects of NaCl (Azhar and McNeilly, 1988). Above examples clearly indicate that salinity tolerance, as in case of growth and yield, appear to be a complex trait.

Early attempts to evaluate the genetic basis of stress tolerance in plants were restricted to simple genetic models. However with the development of molecular markers, evaluating the inheritance of salinity tolerance became a more tractable problem since specific QTLs could be identified. Through the development of molecular markers, it has become possible not only to determine the genetic basis of the trait, but to also map specific chromosomal segments or QTL and determine the relative contribution of each QTL to the variance observed for the trait. Genomic maps have been constructed in various crops to exploit genetic diversity (Thormann et al., 1994), tag qualitative and quantitative traits (Butruille et al., 1999) and analyze the stability of detected QTL across different environments (Hittalmani et al., 2002). Stable and consistent QTLs provide an excellent opportunity to improve the efficiency of selection, especially for traits controlled by multiple genes and highly influenced by the environment, as is the case for salinity (Dudley 1993). The efficiency of marker assisted selection (MAS) is dependent on a number of factors such as the distance of observed QTL from marker loci (Dudley 1993) and the proportion of the total additive variance explained by the QTL (Lande and Thompson 1990). There is considerable evidence to support the view that salt tolerance and its sub-traits are determined by multiple QTLs. In an intergeneric cross of tomato, several QTLs were found associated with fruit yield in plants growing under saline conditions (Breto et al., 1994), although some of the QTL identified were later shown to be dependent on the parentage of the cross (Monforte et al., 1997a). Some QTL associated with specific aspects of fruit yield were found regardless of whether the plants were grown with or without salt; others were detected only under saline or under non-saline conditions (Monforte et al., 1997b). Other crosses have also identified both stress- (salt and cold) specific and stress-non-specific QTLs. The stress-non-specific QTL generally exhibited larger individual effects and accounted for a greater portion of the total phenotypic variation under each condition than the stress-specific QTL (Foolad et al., 1999). As for the QTL identified for fruit yield, QTL associated with germination depend upon the conditions under which germination is assessed (Foolad et al., 1999). A similar situation exists for citrus, where about half of the potential QTL identified depended on the presence or absence of salinity (Tozlu et al., 1999a), and in rice (Gong et al., 1999, 2001) where less than 10% of the QTL were detected both in the presence and absence of salt. Clearly, the major determinants of yield vary with the environmental conditions and quantitative traits typically exhibit a large environment(x)genotype interaction.

The use of tomato has also been important in establishing that QTL associated with tolerance vary with the stage of plant development. The QTL associated with tolerance at germination (Foolad et al., 1997, 1998) and vegetative growth (Foolad and Chen, 1999; Foolad et al., 2001) are shown to differ (Foolad, 1999). Such differences are not restricted to tomato; same have been demonstrated in Arabidopsis (Quesada et al., 2002) and barley (Mano and Takeda, 1997). QTL associated with aspects of ion transport have also been reported in citrus (Tozlu et al., 1999b) and rice (Koyama et al., 2001).

Salt tolerance using transgenic approach

Physiologically, salinity (a) imposes water-deficit that results from the relatively high solute concentrations in the soil, (b) causes ion-specific stresses resulting from altered K+/Na+ ratios and (c) leads to build up in Na+ and Cl- concentrations that are detrimental to plants. Here, we discuss following three key processes that contribute to salt tolerance at the cellular level: (a) the establishment of cellular ion homeostasis, (b) the synthesis of compatible solutes for osmotic adjustment, and (c) the increased ability of the cells to neutralize reactive oxygen species generated during the stress response.

Ion homeostasis: Although Na+ is required in some plants, particularly halophytes (Glenn et al., 1999), a high NaCl concentration is a toxic factor for plant growth. The alteration of ion ratios in plants is due to the influx of Na+ through pathways that function in the acquisition of K+ (Blumwald et al., 2000). The sensitivity to salt of cytosolic enzymes is similar in both glycophytes and halophytes, indicating that the maintenance of a high cytosolic K+/Na+ concentration ratio is a key requirement for plant growth in high salt (Glenn et al., 1999). Strategies that plants could use in order to maintain a high K+/Na+ ratio in the cytosol include: (i) extrusion of Na+ ions out of the cell and (ii) vacuolar compartmentation of Na+ ions. Under typical physiological conditions, plants maintain a high cytosolic K+/Na+ ratio. Given the negative membrane potential difference at the plasma membrane (-140 mV) (Higinbotham, 1973) (Fig. 1), a rise in extracellular Na+ concentration will establish a large electrochemical gradient favoring the passive transport of Na+ into the cells. Na+ extrusion from plant cells is powered by the operation of the plasma membrane H+-ATPase generating an electrochemical H+ gradient that allows plasma membrane Na+/H+ antiporters to couple the passive movement of H+ inside the cells, along its electrochemical potential, to the active extrusion of Na+ (Blumwald et al., 2000). Recently, AtSOS1 from Arabidopsis thaliana has been shown to encode a plasma membrane Na+/H+ antiport with significant sequence similarity to plasma membrane Na+/H+ antiporters from bacteria and fungi (Shi et al., 2000). The overexpression of SOS1 improved the salt tolerance of Arabidopsis, demonstrating that improved salt tolerance can be attained by limiting Na+ accumulation in plant cells (Shi et al., 2003). The compartmentation of Na+ ions into vacuoles also provides an efficient mechanism to avert the toxic effects of Na+ in the cytosol. The transport of Na+ into the vacuoles is mediated by a Na+/H+ antiporter that is driven by the electrochemical gradient of protons generated by the vacuolar H+-translocating enzymes, the H+-ATPase and the H+-PPiase (Blumwald, 1987). The overexpression of a AtNHX1, a vacuolar Na+/H+ antiporter from Arabidopsis, in Arabidopsis resulted in transgenic plants that were able to grow in high salt concentrations (Apse et al., 1999). The paramount role of Na+ compartmentation in plant salt tolerance has been further demonstrated in transgenic tomato and Canola plants overexpressing AtNHX1 (Zhang and Blumwald, 2001, Zhang et al., 2001). Additional evidence supporting the role of vacuolar transport in salt tolerance has been provided by A. thaliana plants overexpressing a vacuolar H+-PPiase (Gaxiola et al., 2001). Transgenic plants overexpressing AVP1, coding for the vacuolar H+-pyrophosphatase, displayed enhanced salt tolerance that was correlated with the increased ion content of the plants. These results suggest that the enhanced vacuolar H+-pumping in the transgenic plants provided additional driving force for vacuolar sodium accumulation via the vacuolar Na+/H+ antiporter.

Figure 1. Schematic representation of primary and secondary transport in the plant cells. Electrogenic H+ transport (H+-ATPase in the plasma membrane and vacuolar membrane, H+-PPiase in the vacuolar membrane) generates gradients of pH and electrical potential difference across the cell and vacuolar membranes. Na+ ions enter the cell and can be translocated out of the cell or into the vacuole by the action of a plasma membrane Na+/H+ antiporter (SOS1) or a vacuolar Na+/H+ antiporter (NHX1), respectively.

Synthesis of compatible solutes: The cellular response of salt tolerant organisms to both long- and short-term salinity stress includes the synthesis and accumulation of a class of osmoprotective compounds known as compatible solutes. These relatively small, organic osmolytes include amino acids and derivatives, polyols and sugars, methylamines etc. The osmolytes are consider to stabilize proteins and cellular structures and can increase the osmotic pressure of the cell (Yancey et al., 1982). This response is homeostatic for cell water status and protein integrity, which is perturbed in the face of soil solutions containing higher amounts of NaCl and the consequent loss of water from the cell. The accumulation of osmotically active compounds in the cytosol increases the osmotic potential to provide a balance between the apoplastic solution, which itself becomes more concentrated with Na+ and Cl- ions, and the vacuolar lumen, which in halophytes can accumulate up to 1 M Na+ (and Cl-). For a short-term stress, this may provide the cells with the ability to prevent water loss. However, for continued growth under salinity stress, an osmotic gradient (towards the cytosol) must be kept in order to maintain turgor, water uptake and facilitate cell expansion.

The enhancement of proline and glycinebetaine synthesis in target plants has received much attention (Rontein et al., 2002). Two themes have emerged from the results of these efforts: (i) there are metabolic limitations on the absolute levels of the target osmolyte that can be accumulated and (ii) the degree to which the transformed plants are able to tolerate salinity stress is not necessarily correlative with the amounts of the osmoprotectants attained. The metabolic limitations on increasing the concentration of a given osmoprotectant is well illustrated with both proline and glycinebetaine. Initial strategies aimed at engineering higher concentrations of proline began with the over-expression of genes encoding the biosynthetic enzymes pyrroline-5-carboxylate (P5C) synthase (P5CS) and P5C reductase (P5CR) that catalyze the two steps between the substrate, glutamic acid and the product, proline. P5CS over-expression in tobacco dramatically elevated free proline in transgenic tobacco (Kishor et al., 1995). However, the regulation of free proline does not appear to be straight-forward. Proline catabolism, via proline dehydrogenase (ProDH), is upregulated by free proline and there exists a strong evidence that free proline inhibits P5CS (Roosens et al., 1999). Further, a two-fold increase in free proline was achieved in tobacco plants transformed with a P5CS modified by site-directed mutagenesis (Hong et al., 2000). This modification alleviated the feedback inhibition by proline on the P5CS activity and resulted in an improved germination and growth of seedlings under salt stress. Free cellular proline levels are also transcriptionally and translationally controlled. P5CR promoter analysis revealed that P5CR transcripts have reduced translational initiation. A 92 bp segment of the 5’UTR of P5CR was sufficient to provide increased mRNA stability and translational inhibition under salt stress to the GUS reporter gene that was been ligated at 3’ end to this small region (Hua et al., 2001). These results highlighted the complex regulation of P5CR during stress and emphasized the importance of stability and translation of P5CR mRNA during salt stress. An alternative approach to attain significant free proline levels, where antisense cDNA transformation was used to decrease ProDH expression, was utilized (Nanjo et al. 1999). Levels of proline in the transgenic Arabidopsis were twice (100 μg/ g fresh weight) that of control plants grown in the absence of stress, and three times higher (600 μg/ g fresh weight) than in control plants grown under stress. The high levels of proline were correlated with an improvement in tolerance to salinity, albeit for a short duration exposure to 600 mM NaCl.

There has been considerably more experimentation directed at the engineering of glycinebetaine synthesis than for any other compatible solute. Unlike proline, glycinebetaine degradation is not significant in plants (Nuccio et al., 2000), but the problems of metabolic fluxes, compounded with the compartmentation of the substrate and product pools, has made the engineering of appreciable levels of glycinebetaine problematic. In plants that are naturally glycinebetaine accumulators (spinach and sugarbeet), synthesis of this compound occurs in the chloroplast, with two oxidation reactions from choline to glycinebetaine. The first oxidation to betaine aldehyde is catalyzed by choline monooxygenase (CMO), an iron-sulfur enzyme. Betaine aldehyde oxidation to glycinebetaine is catalyzed by betaine aldehyde dehydrogenase (BADH), a non-specific soluble aldehyde dehydrogenase (Rathinasabapathi, 2000). In E. coli, these reactions are cytosolic; in this species the first reaction is catalyzed by the protein encoded by the betA locus choline dehydrogenase (CDH), which is an NAD+-dependent enzyme, and BADH in E.coli, is encoded by the betB locus. In Arthrobacter globiformis, the two oxidation steps are catalyzed by one enzyme choline oxidase (COD), which is encoded by the codA locus (Sakamoto and Murata, 2000). The codA gene of A. globiformis offers an attractive alternative to the engineering of glycinebetaine synthesis as it necessitates only a single gene transformation event. This strategy was employed for engineering glycinebetaine synthesis in Arabidopsis (Hayashi et a., 1997). The 35S promoter driven construct for transformation included the transit peptide for the small subunit of Rubisco so that the COD protein would be targeted to the chloroplast. Improved salinity tolerance was obtained in transgenic Arabidopsis that accumulated, as a result of the transformation, 1 μmol/ g fresh weight glycinebetaine. The same construct was used by for transformation of Brassica juncea (Prasad et al., 2000) and tolerance to salinity during germination and seedling establishment was improved markedly in the transgenic lines. COX from Arthrobacter panescens, which is homologous to the A. globiformis COD, was used to transform Arabidopsis, Brassica napus and tobacco (Huang et al., 2000). This set of experiments differs from those above in that the COX protein was directed to the cytoplasm and not to the chloroplast. Improvements in tolerance to salinity and drought and freezing were observed in some transgenics from all three species, but the tolerance was variable. The levels of glycinebetaine in the transgenic plants were not significantly higher than those of wild type plants, but increased significantly with the exogenous supply of choline to plants, suggesting that the supply of choline is a significant constraint on the synthesis of glycinebetaine (Huang et al., 2000).

Two important issues emerge from the results of the above discussion. The first is that the concentrations of glycinebetaine in the transgenic plants were much lower than the concentrations noted in natural accumulators. Despite the fact that these levels are not high enough to be osmotically significant, a moderate (and significant) increase in tolerance to salinity and other stresses was conferred. This raises the possibility that the protection offered by glycinebetaine is not only osmotic, which is a point raised by several of the above groups. Same explanation was also offered by Bonhert and Shen (1999). Compatible solutes, including mannitol may also function as scavengers of oxygen radicals, which may be supported by the results of Alia et al. (1999), where the protection to photosystem II in plants expressing codA was observed. An alternative possibility, not necessarily exclusive of the first, is that the increased level of peroxide generated by the COD/COX oxidation of choline causes an upregulation of ascorbate peroxidase and catalase (Holmstrom et al., 2000) which may also improve the tolerance to salinity stress (Rontein et al., 2002). The second issue is that the level of glycinebetaine production in the transgenics is limited by choline. Because betaine synthesis takes place in the chloroplast, the free choline pool may not reflect its availability to the chloroplast, which may be limited in this compartment by the activity and/ or abundance of choline transporters. However, a dramatic increase in glycinebetaine levels (to 580 μmol/ g dry weight in Arabidopsis) was shown in the transgenic plants when they were supplemented with choline in the growth medium (Huang et al., 2000). This limitation was not explored in the transgenic tobacco expressing E. coli enzymes CDH and BADH in the cytoplasm (Holmstrom et al., 2000). Although these transgenic plants demonstrated an improved tolerance to salinity, glycinebetaine levels were on the order of those mentioned above. Sakamoto and Murata (2000) also asserted that despite the similarities in tolerance exhibited by transgenic plants engineered to synthesize betaine in either the chloroplast or cytoplasm, the site of synthesis of betaine may play a role in the degree of tolerance shown. Indeed, if the betaine present in these plants is localized primarily in the chloroplast, it may be present at significant concentrations (50 mM) (Hayashi et al., 1997). However, Sakamoto and Murata (2000) downplayed the limitation of the metabolic pool of choline on the levels of glycinebetaine obtained in the engineered plants, by suggesting that the choline oxidizing activity may be the limiting factor. This argument seems to be supported by Huang et al. (2000) who found that the levels of glycinebetaine correlated with the levels of COX activity measured in each plant. The increase in glycinebetaine with exogenous choline argues against this notion. Stronger evidence for the limitations of choline metabolism have been presented by McNeil et al. (2001). By over-expressing spinach phosphoethanolamine N-methyltransferase (PEAMT), which catalyzes the three methylation reactions required for the conversion of phosphoethanolamine to phosphocholine, up to a 50-fold increase in free choline was obtained. This led to an increase in glycinebetaine levels (+60%) in plants that were expressing spinach CMO and BADH in the chloroplast. Further, the addition of ethanolamine to the plant growth medium caused an increased choline and glycinebetaine levels, showing that the metabolic flux through this pathway is also limited by the supply of ethanolamine. As PEAMT is itself inhibited by phosphocholine, further engineering efforts need to include (a) the modification of PEAMT to remove this inhibition (McNeil et al., 2001), (b) increasing the supply of ethanolamine by overexpression of serine decarboxylase and (c) resolving the compartmentation problem of choline supply and choline oxidation, either by use of choline oxidation in the cytoplasm or by finding the appropriate transporters to improve choline supply to the chloroplast (Rontein et al., 2002).

Finally, as the compatible solutes are non-toxic, the interchangeability of these compounds between species has held much interest (Table 1). The recent examples include the engineering of (a) ectoine synthesis with enzymes from the halophylic bacterium Halomonas elongata in plants (Ono et al., 1999; Nakayama et al., 2000) and (b) trehalose synthesis which occurs in bacteria, yeast and in extremely desiccation-tolerant plants (Goddijn and van Dun, 1999) into potato (Yeo et al., 2000) and rice (Garg et al., 2002). An intriguing report on the improved tolerance to salinity in tobacco expressing yeast invertase in the apoplast highlights the potential of manipulating sucrose metabolism (Fukushima e al., 2001). The authors reported improved salt tolerance of transgenic tobacco plants expressing an yeast invertase in their apoplastic space, and concluded that the changes in sucrose metabolism in the transgenic plants protected the photosynthetic apparatus under salt stress. The overexpression of polyols, such as mannitol (Tarczynski et al., 1993) and D-ononitol (Sheveleva et al., 1997) have been shown to contribute to enhanced drought and salt tolerance in transgenic tobacco plants.

TABLE 1. Salt tolerance in transgenic plants expressing genes involved in osmolyte biosynthesis, ion transporters, redox proteins and transcription factors.


Gene Product


Cellular role(s)

Target plant

Parameter studied


Osmolytes and Compatible solutes


Choline dehydrogenase

E. coli



Dry weight

Lilius et al. 1996
Holmstrom et al. (2000)


Betaine dehydrogenase





Liang et al. 1997

EctA, ectB, ectC

L-2,4-diaminobutyric acid acetyltransferase,
L-2,4-diaminobutyric acid trans- aminase, L-ectoine synthase.

Halomonas elongata



Salinity tolerance

Nakayama et al. 2000


Trehalose-6-P synthase
Trehalose-6-P phosphatase

E. coli




Increased biomass, morphogenesis

Pilon-Smits et al. 1998
Garg et al. 2002.


Trehalose-6-phosphate synthase

S. cerevisiae



Improved drought tolerance

Romero et al 1997


Δ1-Pyrroline-5-carboxylate synthase

V. aconitifolia



Increased proline; plant growth

Kishor et al. 1995


Proline dehydrogenase

Arabidopsis thaliana



Inflorescence lodging in response to NaCl stress

Nanjo et al. 1999


Myo-inositol-O-methyl transferase

Messembryanthemu-m chrystallinum



Seed germination

Vernon et al. 1993; Sheveleva et al. 1997


Choline oxidase

Arthobacter globiformis; Arthobacter panescens



Seed germination; plant growth

Hayashi et al. 1997
Alia et al. 1998
Sakamoto et al. 1998
Huang et al. 2000
Prasad et al. 2000


FMN-binding protein

S. cerevisiae

K+/Na+ homeostasis



Espinosa-Ruiz et al.1999

Ion Transporters and Ion Homeostasis


Vacuolar Na+/H+ antiporter

A. thaliana

Na+ vacuolar sequestration

Tomato Arabidopsis B. napus

Biomass, fruit and oil production

Apse et al. 1999
Zhang and Blumwald, 2001; Zhang et al. 2001


Plasma membrane Na+/H+ antiporter

A. thaliana

Na+ extrusion



Shi et al. 2003


Vacuolar H+-pyrophosphatase

A. thaliana

Vacuolar acidification



Gaxiola et al. 2001


K+/Na+ transport regulation

S. cerevisiae

K+/Na+ homeostasis

Tomato melon Arabidopsis

Sustain of K+/Na+ ratio; plant growth

Bordas et al. 1997
Gisbert et al. 2000
Yang et al. 2001

Redox proteins


Superoxide dismutase

S. cerevisiae

Reduction of O2 content



Tanaka et al. 1999



B. juncea

S-D- Lactoylglutathi-one


Chlorophyll content of detached leaves

Veena et al. 1999



N. tabaccum

Change cell wall properties


Germination ; water retention in seed walls

Amaya et al. 1999


Glutathione S-transferase
Glutathione peroxidase

N. tabaccum
N. tabaccum

ROS scavenging


Germination and growth

Roxas et al. 2000

Transcription and Signal Transduction Factors


Transcription factor

A. thaliana

Improved gene expression


Plant growth and survival rate

Kasuga et al. 1999



S. cerevisiae

Improved Ca2+ signaling


Plant growth

Pardo et al. 1998


Protein kinase

O. sativa

Improve gene expression


Wilty phenotype

Saijo et al. 2000



Heat shock protein

A. halophytica

Protein stabilization


CO2 fixation, Na+ content

Sugino et al. 1999


Apoplastic yeast-derived invertase

S. cerevisiae

Sucrose synthesis


Photosynthetic activity and osmotic pressure

Fukushima et al. 2001

Antioxidant protection: An important aspect of salinity stress in plants is the stress-induced production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) including superoxide radicals (O2-), hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) and hydroxyl radicals (OH.). ROS are a product of altered chloroplast and mitochondria metabolism during stress. These ROS cause oxidative damage to different cellular components including membrane lipids, protein and nucleic acids (Halliwell and Gutteridge, 1986). The alleviation of this oxidative damage could provide enhanced plant resistance to salt stress. Plants use low molecular mass antioxidants such as ascorbic acid and reduced glutathione and employ a diverse array of enzymes such as superoxide dismutases (SOD), catalases (CAT), ascorbate peroxidases (APX), glutathione S-transferases (GST) and glutathione peroxidases (GPX) to scavenge ROS. Transgenic rice over-expressing yeast mitochondrial Mn-dependent SOD displayed enhanced salt tolerance (Tanaka et al., 1999). The overexpression of a cell wall peroxidase in tobacco plants improved germination under osmotic stress (Amaya et al., 1999). Transgenic tobacco plants over-expressing both GST and GPX displayed improved seed germination and seedling growth under stress (Roxas et al., 1997). Subsequent studies (Roxas et al., 2000) demonstrated that in addition to increased GST/GPX activities, the transgenic seedlings contained higher levels of glutathione and ascorbate than wild-type seedlings, showed higher levels of monodehydroascorbate reductase activity and the glutathione pools were more oxidized. These results would indicate that the increased glutathione-dependent peroxidase scavenging activity and the associated changes in glutathione and ascorbate metabolism led to reduced oxidative damage in the transgenic plants and contributed to their increased salt tolerance.

Assessment of salt tolerance in transgenic plants

The assessment of salt tolerance in transgenic experiments as described above has been mostly carried out using limited number of seedlings/ mature plants in laboratory experiments. However, the level of salt tolerance of crops ultimately needs to be evaluated as yield from a producer’s fields. The evaluation of field performance under saline stress conditions is difficult because of the variability of salt levels in field-conditions (Richards, 1983; Daniells et al., 2001) and the potential for interactions with other environmental factors, including soil fertility, temperature, light intensity and transpirational water loss. Some work also aims at the prediction of field performance carried out in trial plots, or using a solution-based method where the salinity of the medium can be readily adjusted to required values (Francois and Maas, 1994). This type of experiment often precludes measuring yield through lack of space and estimates of tolerance obtained from such experiments are often not borne out by the response of plants in the field (Rowland et al., 1989; Daniells et al., 2001). Evaluating tolerance is made more complex by variation in sensitivity to salt during the life cycle. For example, it is known that grain yield in rice is much more depressed by salt than is vegetative growth (Khatun and Flowers, 1995): germination is relatively salt resistant. In tomato, tolerance at germination is not correlated with the ability to grow under salt stress: both are controlled by different mechanisms (Foolad and Lin, 1997), although some genotypes display similar tolerance at germination and during vegetative growth (Foolad and Chen, 1999).

It thus needs to be recognized that the assessment of stress tolerance in the laboratory often has little correlation to tolerance in the field. Although there have been many successes in developing stress-tolerant transgenics in model plants such as tobacco, Arabidopsis or rice (Grover et al,. 2003), there is urgent need to test these successes in crops. Rice has the advantage that it is both the model monocot and an important crop. However, same is not the case when transgenes are tested with tobacco or Arabidopsis (reviewed in Grover et al., 2003; Flowers, 2004). This brings a number of technical and financial challenges associated with transforming many of the crop plants, particularly the monocots. First, transformation of any monocot other than rice is still not routine and to develop a series of independent homozygous T2 lines is costly, both in money and time. Second, the stress tolerance screens will need to include a field component since many of the stress tolerance assays used by basic researchers involve using rich nutrient media which include sucrose. This type of screen is unlikely to have relationship to field performance. Finally, since saline soils are often complex and may include NaCl, CaCl2, CaSO4 and Na2SO4, plants that show particular promise will eventually have to be tested in all of these environments.

Challenges and Opportunities

Conventional breeding programs for raising salt tolerant genotypes have meet with limited success. This lack of success is in part because breeders prefer to evaluate their genetic material in ideal conditions. This issue is getting more urgent to deal with the growing interest of seed companies in making salt tolerant crops. Because of the fact that producers in general prefer to avoid using land that has reduced yields due to salinity, and plant breeding companies in general tend to develop varieties under conditions which are optimal, the efforts necessary to produce new salt-tolerant cultivars remain inconsequential. From a business perspective, in order for plant breeding companies to invest in the development of new varieties with enhanced stress tolerance, there will always be the question raised as to whether the investment in the development of these cultivars is worth the effort. There is no benefit in developing salinity tolerant plants unless there are the economic drivers which will allow the plant to be competitively productive with non-saline tolerant plants growing on uncompromised soil. The viewpoints of basic researchers might differ—for the researchers the actual though small increase in salt tolerance is worth the efforts.

In evaluating the possibility of improving stress tolerance in plants, there are a number of considerations that we propose that the research community should consider including:

While it has been recognized by many researchers that there are dramatic changes in gene expression associated with all types of stresses, the promoters that are most commonly used for transgene introductions are primarily constitutively expressed, including the CaMV35S promoter, ubiquitin, and actin promoters (Grover et al,. 2003). Recent studies have noted that the over-expression of specific stress induced genes under the control of stress induced or tissue specific promoters often display a better phenotype than the same genes expressed under a constitutive promoter (Zhu et al., 1998; Kasuga et al., 1999).

Second, while there have been a number of successes in the production of abiotic stress-tolerant plants using tobacco or Arabidopsis using specific genes, there is a clear need to begin to introduce these tolerance genes into crop plants. Moreover, even though researchers tend to focus on a few basic plant systems, with Arabidopsis, tobacco and rice being the major species of choice, there has been no attempt to choose specific genetic backgrounds.

Third, it is likely that the effectiveness of a specific transgene will be based on the specific genetic environment into which it is transformed. One component of this is the well known phenomena of “position effect’, however in addition, the ability of a transgene to work may well be determined by the overall genetic background, independent from the chromosomal location of the transgene, referred to as “Transgene Combining Ability” (TCA).

Finally, we also need to establish better comparative systems. At the same time, we need to look at rational concepts for combining genes, just as the disease resistance researchers are now doing with gene stacking. For example, the over-expression of AtSOS1 in meristems (non-vacuolated cells) and AtNHX1 (for vacuolar Na+ accumulation), together with the overproduction of compatible solutes would provide not only the ability of using NaCl as an osmoticum during vegetative growth but also would provide the seedlings with the ability to reduce Na+ toxicity during early growth and seedling establishment. Further wherever applicable, genes for protection against oxidative stress must be combined, particularly in actively photosynthesizing cells that are prone to more chloroplast damage due to ROS.

While progress in improving stress tolerance has been slow, there are a number of opportunities and reasons for optimism. Over the last ten years there has been the development of a number of the functional tools that can allow us to dissect many of the fundamental questions associated with stress tolerance. These include: (a) the development of molecular markers for gene mapping and the construction of associated maps, (b) the development of EST libraries, (c) the complete sequencing of plant genomes including Arabidopsis, rice and maize, (d) the production of T-DNA or transposon tagged mutagenic populations of Arabidopsis and (e) the development of a number of forward genetics tools that can be used in gene function analysis such as TILLING (Colbert et al., 2001). Thus, we need to focus on looking at the comparative effects and interaction of specific transgenes within a defined genetic background and determine the efficacy of these approaches in the field.


Over the last 50 years, many researchers have argued for the development of salt-tolerant crops from true halophytes. Although halophytes are present in a wide diversity of plant forms, to date very few halophytic crops can compete effectively with glycophytic crops (Glenn et al., 1999). Moreover, research on the physiology of tolerance suggests that the overall trait is determined by a number of sub-traits any of which might, in turn, be determined by any number of genes. We believe that by comparing different genes and genetic combinations, researchers will be able to advance the field more quickly, and develop the stress tolerant germplasm.


Akbar M, Khush GS, Hille R, Lambers D. 1986. Genetics of salt tolerance in rice. In: Proceedings of the international rice genetics symposium, IRRI, 399–409.

Akbar M, Yabuno T. 1977. Breeding saline-resistant varieties of rice. IV. Inheritance of delayed type panicle sterility induced by salinity. Jap. J. Breeding 27, 237–240.

Akbar M, Yabuno T, Nakao S. 1972. Breeding for saline-resistant varieties of rice. I. Variability for salt tolerance among some rice varieties. Jap. J. Breeding 22, 277–284.

Al-Doss AA, Smith SE. 1998. Registration of AZ-97MEC and AZ-97MEC-ST very non-dormant alfalfa germplasm pools with increased shoot weight and differential response to saline irrigation. Crop Sci. 38, 568–568.

Alia, Kondo,Y, Sakamoto, A, Nonaka, H, Hayashi, H, Saradhi, PP, Chen, THH, Murata, N. 1999. Enhanced tolerance to light stress of transgenic Arabidopsis plants that express the codA gene for a bacterial choline oxidase. Plant Mol. Biol. 40, 279-288.

Amaya I, Botella MA, De La Calle M, Medina MI, Heredia A, Bressan RA, Hasegawa PM, Quesada MA, Valpuesta V. 1999. Improved germination under osmotic stress of tobacco plants overexpressing a cell wall peroxidase. FEBS Letters 457, 80-84.

Apse MP, Aharon GS, Snedden WA, Blumwald E. 1999. Salt tolerance conferred by overexpression of a vacuolar Na+/H+ antiport in Arabidopsis. Science 285, 1256-1258.

Azhar FM, McNeilly T. 1988. The genetic basis for salt tolerance in Sorghum bicolor (L) Moench seedlings. Plant Breeding 101, 114–121.

Blumwald E. 1987. Tonoplast vesicles for the study of ion transport in plant vacuoles. Physiol. Plant. 69, 731-734.

Blumwald E, Aharon GS, and Apse MP. 2000. Sodium transport in plant cells. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1465, 140-151.

Bohnert, HJ, and Shen B. 1999. Transformation and compatible solutes. Sci.Hort. 78, 237-260

Bordas M, Montesinos C, Dabauza M, Salvador A, Roig LA, Serrano R, Moreno V. 1997. Transfer of the yeast salt tolerance gene HAL 1 to Cucumis melo L. cultivars and in vitro evaluation of salt tolerance. Trans. Res. 6, 41–50

Boyer, JS. 1982. Plant Productivity And Environment. Science 218, 443-448.

Breto MP, Asins MJ, Carbonell EA. 1994. Salt tolerance in Lycopersicon species. 3. Detection of quantitative trait loci by means of molecular markers. Theor. Appl.Genet. 88, 395–401.

Butruille DV, Guries RP, Osborn TC. 1999. Linkage analysis of molecular markers and quantitative trait loci in populations of inbred backcross lines of Brasica napus L. Genetics 153,949-964.

Colbert T, Till BJ, Tompa R, Reynolds S, Steine MN, Yeung AT, McCallum CM, Comai L, Henikoff S. 2001. High-throughput screening for induced point mutations Plant Physiol.126, 480-484

Daniells IG, Holland JF, Young RR, Alston CL, Bernardi AL. 2001. Relationship between yield of grain sorghum (Sorghum bicolor) and soil salinity under field conditions. Aus. J. Exp. Agr. 41, 211–217.

Dierig DA, Shannon MC, Grieve CM. 2001. Registration of WCL-SL1 salt-tolerant Lesquerella fendleri germplasm. Crop Sci. 41, 604–605.

Dudley JW. 1993 Molecular markers in plant improvement: manipulation of genes affecting quantitative traits. Crop Sci. 33,660-668.

Epstein E. 1977. Genetic potentials for solving problems of soil mineral stress: adaptation of crops to salinity. In: Wright MJ, ed. Plant adaptation to mineral stress in problem soils. Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Agricultural Experiment Station, 73–123.

Epstein E, Norlyn JD, Rush DW, Kingsbury R, Kelley DB, Wrana AF. 1980. Saline culture of crops: a genetic approach. Science 210, 399–404.

Epstein E. 1983. Crops tolerant to salinity and other mineral stresses. In better Crops for Food, Ciba Foundation Symposium. Eds. J. Nugent and M. O’Connor, pp 61-82. London: Pitman.

Espinosa-Ruiz A, Belles JM, Serrano R, & Culiaņez-Macia FA. 1999. Arabidopsis thaliana AtHAL3: a flavoprotein related to salt and osmotic tolerance and plant growth. Plant J. 20, 529-539.

Flowers TJ, 2004. Improving crop salt tolerance. J. Exp. Bot. 55: 307-319,

Flowers TJ, Yeo AR. 1995. Breeding for salinity resistance in crop plants—where next? Australian Journal of Plant Physiology 22, 875–884.

Foolad MR. 1999. Comparison of salt tolerance during seed germination and vegetative growth in tomato by QTL mapping. Genome 42, 727-734

Foolad MR, Chen FQ. 1999. RFLP mapping of QTLs conferring salt tolerance during the vegetative stage in tomato. Theor. Appl. Genet. 99, 235–243.

Foolad MR, Chen FQ, Lin GY. 1998. RFLP mapping of QTLs conferring salt tolerance during germination in an interspecific cross of tomato. Theor. Appl. Genet. 97, 1133–1144.

Foolad MR, Lin GY. 1997. Absence of a genetic relationship between salt tolerance during seed germination and vegetative growth in tomato. Plant Breeding 116, 363–367.

Foolad MR, Lin GY, Chen FQ. 1999. Comparison of QTLs for seed germination under non-stress, cold stress and salt stress in tomato. Plant Breeding 118, 167–173.

Foolad MR, Stoltz T, Dervinis C, Rodriguez RL, Jones RA. 1997. Mapping QTLs conferring salt tolerance during germination in tomato by selective genotyping. Mol. Breeding

3, 269–277.

Foolad MR, Zhang LP, Lin GY. 2001. Identification and validation of QTLs for salt tolerance during vegetative growth in tomato by selective genotyping. Genome 44, 444-454

Francois LE, Maas EV. 1994. Crop response and management on salt-affected soils. In: Pessarakli M, ed. Handbook of plant and crop stress. New York: Marcel Dekker, 149–181.

Fukushima E, Arata Y, Endo T, Sonnewald U, Sato F., 2001 Improved salt tolerance of transgenic tobacco expressing apoplastic yeast-derived invertase. Plant Cell

Physiol. 42, 245-249.

Garg, AK, Kim JK, Owens TG, Ranwala AP, Do Choi Y, Kochian LV, Wu RJ. 2002. Trehalose accumulation in rice plants confers high tolerance leveles to different abiotic stresses. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99,15898-15903.

Gaxiola RA, Li J, Unurraga S, Dang LM, Allen GJ, Alper SL, Fink GR. 2001. Drought- and salt-tolerant plants result form overexpression of the AVP1 H+-pump. Proc. Nat.l Acad. Sci.USA 98, 11444-11449.

Glenn EP, Brown JJ, Blumwald E. 1999. Salt tolerance and crop potential of halophytes. Crit. Rev.Plant Sci. 18, 227–255.

Gisbert C, Rus AM, Bolarin MC, Lopez-Coronado JM, Arrillaga I, Montesinos C. Caro M, Serrano R, Moreno V. 2000 The yeast HAL 1 gene improves salt tolerance of transgenic tomato. Plant Physiol. 123, 393–402

Goddijn OJM, and Van Dun K. 1999. Trehalose metabolism in plants. Tr.Plant Sci 4, 315-319.

Gong JM, He P, Qian QA, Shen LS, Zhu LH, Chen SY. 1999. Identification of salt-tolerance QTL in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Chinese Sci. Bull. 44, 68–71.

Gong JM, Zheng XW, Du BX, Quian Q, Chen SY, Zhu LH, He P. 2001. Comparative study of QTLs for agronomic traits of rice (Oryza sativa L.) between salt stress and non-stress environment. Science in China (Series C) 44, 73–82.

Grover A, Aggarwal PK, Kapoor A, Katiyar-Agarwal S, Agarwal M, Chandramouli A. 2003. Addressing abiotic stresses in agriculture through transgenic technology. Curr. Sci. 84, 355-367.

Halliwell B. And Gutteridge JMC. 1986. Oxygen free radicals and iron in relation to biology and medicine: some problems and concepts. Arch.Biochem.Biophys.246, 501-514.

Hasegawa PM, Bressan RA, Zhu JK, Bohnert HJ. 2000. Plant cellular and molecular responses to high salinity. Annu. Rev.Plant Physiol.PlantMol. Biol. 51, 463-499.

Hayashi H, Alia Mustardy L, Deshnium PG, Ida M. Murata N. 1997. Transformation of Arabidopsis thaliana with the codA gene for choline oxidase; accumulation of glycinebetaine and enhanced tolerance to salt and cold stress. Plant J. 12, 133-142.

Higinbotham N. 1973. Electropotentials of plant cells. Annu. Rev.Plant Physiol. 24, 25-46.

Hittalmani S, Shahidhar HE, Bagali PG, Huang N, Sidhu JS, Singh VP, Khush GS. 2002. Molecular mapping of quantitative trait loci for plant growth, yield and yield related traits across diverse locations in a doubled haploid rice population. Euphytica 125,207-214.

Holmstrom KO, Somersalo S, Manda A, Palva TE and Welin B. 2000. Improved tolerance to salinity and low temperature in transgenic tobacco producing glycine betaine. J. Exp. Bot 51, 177-185.

Hong ZL, Lakkineni K, Zhang ZM, Verma DPS. 2000. Removal of feedback inhibition of delta(1)-pyrroline-5-carboxylate synthetase results in increased proline accumulation and protection of plants from osmotic stress. Plant Physiol. 122, 1129-1136.

Hua XJ, Van De Cotte B, Van Montagu M and Verbruggen, N. 2001. The 5' untranslated region of the At-P5R gene is involved in both transcriptional and post-transcriptional regulation. Plant J. 26, 157-169.

Huang J, Hirji R, Adam L, Rozwadowski KL, Hammerlindl JK, Keller WA, Selvaraj, G. 2000. Genetic engineering of glycinebetaine production toward enhancing stress tolerance in plants: metabolic limitations. Plant Physiol. 122, 747-756.

Jacobsen T, Adams RM. 1958. Salt and silt in ancient Mesopotamian agriculture. Science 128, 1251–1258.

Kasuga, M, Liu Q, Miura S, Yamaguchi-Shinozaki, K, Shinozaki K. 1999. Improving plant drought, salt, and freezing tolerance by gene transfer of a single stress-inducible transcription factor. Nat. Biotechnol. 17, 287–291

Khatun S, Flowers TJ. 1995. Effects of salinity on seed set in rice. Plant, Cell and Envirt

18, 61–67.

Kishor PBK, Hong Z, Miao GH, Hu CAA and Verma DPS. 1995. Overexpression of Δ-1-pyrroline-5-carboxylate synthetase increases proline production and confers osmotolerance in transgenic plants. Plant Physiol. 108, 1387-1394.

Koyama ML, Levesley A, Koebner RMD, Flowers TJ, Yeo AR. 2001. Quantitative trait loci for component physiological traits determining salt tolerance in rice. Plant Physiol. 125, 406–422.

Lande R, Thompson R. 1990. Efficiency of marker-assisted selection in the improvement of quantitative traits. Genetics. 124,743-756.

Liang, Z, Ma D, Tang L, Hong Y, Luo A, Zhou J, Dai X. 1997. Expression of the spinach betaine aldehyde dehydrogenase (BADH) gene in transgenic tobacco plants. Chin. J. Biotechnol. 13, 153–159

Lilius, G, Holmberg N, Bulow L. 1996. Enhanced NaCl stress tolerance in transgenic tobacco expressing bacterial choline dehydrogenase. Biotechnology 14, 177–180

Lyon C. 1941. Responses of two species of tomatoes and the F1 generation to sodium sulphate in the nutrient medium. Bot. Gazette 103, 107–122.

Mano Y, Takeda K. 1997. Mapping quantitative trait loci for salt tolerance at germination and the seedling stage in barley (Hordeum vulgare L.). Euphytica 94, 263–272.

McNeil SD, Nuccio ML, Ziemak MJ, Hanson AD. 2001. Enhanced synthesis of choline and glycine betaine in transgenic tobacco plants that overexpress

phosphoethanolamine N-mehtyltransferase. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 98, 10001-10005.

Moeljopawiro S, Ikehashi H. 1981. Inheritance of salt resistance in rice. Euphytica 30, 291–300.

Monforte AJ, Asins MJ, Carbonell EA. 1997a. Salt tolerance in Lycopersicon species. V. Does genetic variability at quantitative trait loci affect their analysis? Theo.Appl. Genet. 95, 284–293.

Monforte AJ, Asins MJ, Carbonell EA. 1997b. Salt tolerance in Lycopersicon species. VI. Genotype-by-salinity interaction in quantitative trait loci detection: constitutive and response QTLs. Theor. Appl. Genet. 95, 706–713.

Nakayama H, Yoshida, K, Ono H, Murooka Y. Shinmyo A. 2000. Ectoine, the compatible solute of Halomonas elongata, confers hyperosmotic tolerance in cultured tobacco cells. Plant Physiol.122, 1239-1247.

Nanjo T, Kobayashi M, Yoshiba Y, Kakubari Y. Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K. Shinozaki K. 1999. Antisense suppression of proline degradation improves tolerance to freezing and salinity in Arabidopsis thaliana. FEBS Lett. 461, 205-210.

Nuccio ML, McNeil SD, Ziemak MJ, Hanson AD, Jain RK, Selvaraj G. 2000. Choline import into chloroplasts limits glycine betaine synthesis in tobacco: Analysis of plants engineered with a chloroplastic or a cytosolic pathway. Metabol. Eng. 2, 300-311.

Ono H, Sawads K, Khunajakr N, Tao T, Yamamoto M, Hiramoto M, Shinmyo A, Takano M. Murooka Y. 1999. Characterization of biosynthetic enzymes for ectoine as a compatible solute in a moderately halophilic eubacterium, Halomonas elongata. J. Bacteriol.181, 91-99.

Owen PA, Nickell CD, Noel GR, Thomas DJ, Frey K. 1994. Registration of ‘saline’ soybean. Crop Sci. 34, 1689.

Pardo JM, Reddy MP, Yang S, Maggio A, Huh GH, Matsumoto T, Coca MA, Paino-D’Urzo M, Koiwa H, Yun DJ, Watad AA, Bressan RA & Hasegawa PM 1998.

Stress signaling through 21 Ca /calmodulin-dependent protein phosphatase calcineurin mediates salt adaptation in plants. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95, 9681–9686

Pilon-Smits EAH, Terry N, Sears T, Kim H, Zayed A, Hwang SB, Van Dun K, Voogd E. Verwoerd TC, Krutwagen RWH Goddijn OJM. 1998.

Trehalose-producing transgenic tobacco plants show improved growth performance under drought stress. J. Plant Physiol. 152, 525-532.

Quesada V, Garcia-Martinez S, Piqueras P, Ponce MR, Micol JL. 2002. Genetic architecture of NaCl tolerance in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol.130, 951–963.

Prasad KVSK, Sharmila P, Kumar PA, Saradhi PP. 2000. Transformation of Brassica juncea (L.) Czern with bacterial codA gene enhances its tolerance to salt stress. Mol. Breeding 6, 489-499.

Rathinasabapathi B. 2000. Metabolic engineering for stress tolerance: Installing osmoprotectant synthesis pathways. Annals Bot. 86, 709-716.

Richards RA. 1983. Should selection for yield in saline regions be made on saline or non-saline soils. Euphytica 32, 431–438.

Romero C, Belles JM, Vaya JL, Serrano R, Culianez-Macia FA. 1997. Expression of the yeast trehalose-6-phosphate synthase gene in transgenic tobacco plants: pleiotropic phenotypes include drought tolerance. Planta 201, 293–297.

Rontein, D, Basset, G. Hanson, A.D. 2002. Metabolic engineering of osmoprotectant accumulation in plants. Metabolic Eng, 4, 49-56.

Roosens NH, Willem R, Li Y, Verbruggen II, Biesemans M, Jacobs M. 1999. Proline metabolism in the wild-type and in a salt-tolerant mutant of Nicotiana plumbaginifolia studied by (13)C-nuclear magnetic resonance imaging. Plant Physiol. 121, 1281-90.

Rowland GG, McHughen A, McOnie C. 1989. Field performance at saline-affected sites of a somaclonal variant of McGregor flax selected for salt tolerance in vitro. Can. J. Plant Sci. 69, 49–60.

Roxas VP, Smith RK, Allen ER, Allen RD. 1997. Overexpression of glutathione S-transferase/glutathione peroxidase enhances the growth of transgenic tobacco seedlings during stress. Nature Biotechnol. 15, 988-991.

Roxas, VP, Lodhi SA, Garrett DK, Mahan JR, Allen RD. 2000. Stress tolerance in transgenic tobacco seedlings that overexpress glutathione S-transferase/glutathione peroxidase. Plant Cell Rep. 2000, 41:1229-1234.

Sakamoto A, Alia Murata N. Murata A. 1998. Metabolic engineering of rice leading to biosynthesis of glycinebetaine and tolerance to salt and cold. Plant Mol. Biol. 38, 1011-1019.

Sakamoto, A. And Murata, N. 2000. Genetic engineering of glycinebetaine synthesis in plants: current status and implications for enhancement of stress tolerance. J. Exp. Bot. 51, 81-88.

Saijo, Y., Hata, S., Kyozuka, J., Shimamoto, K., Izui, K. 2000. Over-21 expression of a single Ca -dependent protein kinase confers both cold and salt /drought tolerance on rice plants. Plant J. 23, 319–327

Saranga Y, Zamir D, Marani A, Rudich J. 1991. Breeding tomatoes for salt tolerance—field-evaluation of Lycopersicon germplasm for yield and dry-matter production. J.Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 116, 1067–1071.

Sheveleva E, Chmara W, Bohnert H, Jensen R. 1997. Increased salt and drought tolerance by D-oninitol production in transgenic Nicotiana tabaccum L. Plant Physiol. 115, 1211-1219.

Shi H, Ishitani M, Kim C, Zhu JK. 2000. The Arabidopsis thaliana salt tolerance gene SOS1 encodes a putative Na+/H+ antiporter. Proc.Natl Acad. Sci. 97, 6896-6901.

Shi H, Lee BH, Wu SJ, Zhu JK. 2003. Overexpression of a plasma membrane Na+/H+ antiporter gene improves salt tolerance in Arabidopsis thaliana. Nature Biotechnol. 21, 81-85.

Subbarao GV, Johansen C, Kumar Rao JVDK, Jana MK. 1990. Salinity tolerance in F1 hybrids of pigeonpea and a tolerant wild relative. Crop Sci 30, 785–788.

Sugino M, Hibino T, Tanaka Y, Nii N, Takabe T, Takabe T. 1999 Overexpression of DnaK from a halotolerant cyano-bacterium Aphanothece halophytica acquires resistance to salt stress in transgenic tobacco plants. Plant Sci. 146, 81–88

Tal M, Shannon MC. 1983. Salt tolerance in two wild relatives of the cultivated tomato: Responses of Lycopersican esculentum, L. cheesmani, L. peruvianum, Solanum pennelli, and F1 hybrids of high salinity. Aust. J. Plant Physiol. 10, 109–117.

Tanaka Y, Hibin T, Hayashi Y, Tanaka A, Kishitani S. Takabe T, Yokota S.Takabe T. 1999. Salt tolerance of transgenic rice overexpressing yeast mitochondrial Mn-SOD in chloroplasts. Plant Sci. 148, 131-138.

Tarczynski M, Jensen R, Bohnert H. 1993. Stress protection of transgenic tobacco by production of the osmolyte mannitol. Science 259, 508-510.

Thormann CE, Ferreira ME, Camargo LEA, Tivang JG, Osborn TC. 1994. Comparison of RFLP and RAPD markers to estimate genetic relationship within and among cruciferous species. Theor Appl Genet 88:973-980.

Tozlu I, Guy CL, Moore GA. 1999a. QTL analysis of morphological traits in an intergeneric BC1 progeny of Citrus and Poncirus under saline and non-saline environments. Genome 42, 1020–1029.

Tozlu I, Guy CL, Moore GA. 1999b. QTL analysis of Na and Cl accumulation related traits in an intergeneric BC1 progeny of Citrus and Poncirus under saline and non saline environments. Genome 42, 692–705.

Veena J, Reddy VS, Sopory SK. 1999. Glyoxalase I from Brassica juncea: molecular cloning, regulation and its over-expression confer tolerance in transgenic tobacco under stress. Plant J. 17, 385–395

Vernon DM, Tarczynski, MC, Jensen RG, Bohnert HJ. 1993. Cyclitol production in transgenic tobacco. Plant J. 4, 199-205.

Yancey PH, Clark ME, Hand SC, Bowlus RD, Somero GN. 1982. Living with water stress: evolution of osmolyte systems. Science 217,1214-1222.

Yang SX, Zhao YX, Zhang Q, He YK, Zhang H, Luo H. 2001 HAL 1mediate salt adaptation in Arabidopsis thaliana. Cell Res 11, 142–148

Yeo ET, Kwon HB, Han SE, Lee JT, Ryu JC Byu MO. 2000. Genetic engineering of drought resistant potato plants by introduction of the trehalose-6-phosphate synthase (TPS1) gene from Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Molecules and Cells 10, 263-268.

Zhang, H.X. And Blumwald, E. (2001) Transgenic salt-tolerant tomato plants accumulate salt in foliage but not in fruit. Nature Biotechnol. 19, 765-768.

Zhang HX, Hodson JN, Williams JP, Blumwald E. 2001 Engineering salt-tolerant Brassica plants: Characterization of yield and seed oil quality in transgenic plants with increased vacuolar sodium accumulation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci.USA 98, 6896-6901.

Zhu, B., Su, J., Chang, M, Verma, DPS, Fan Y-L, Wu, R, 1998. Overexpressin of a delta1-Pyrroline-5-carboxylate synthetase gene and analysis of tolerance to water- and salt-stress in transgenic rice. Plant Sci. 139, 41-48.

Zhu JK. 2001. Cell signaling under salt, water and cold stress. Cur. Op. Plant Biol. 4, 401-406.

Zhu JK. 2002. Salt and drought stress signal transduction in plants. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 53, 247-273.

Top Of PageNext Page