Previous PageTable Of Contents

Phosphorus application to Maize-Cowpea sequences in smallholder farming systems of Zimbabwe

Nhamo Nhamo1, Pauline P. Nhamo2 and Dominica B. Shumba3

1ICRAF-Zimbabwe, P O Box CY594, Causeway, Harare, Zimbabwe. Email: nnhamo@mweb.co.zw
2
ICRISAT-Bulawayo, P O Box 776, Bulawayo.
3
AREX, P O Box 50, Shurugwi.

Abstract

Cowpea can increase the on-farm nitrogen (N) budgets through the biological N fixation. However, legumes require adequate phosphorus (P) for efficient N fixation to occur and to reduce the cost of purchased nitrogen fertilizers. Field experiments were conducted on P application effects in maize-cowpea sequences. In the first season, 20 kg/ha of P2O5 increased both maize and cowpea yields significantly (P<0.05) on P-deficient sandy soils. There was a decline in the kg grain/kg P applied with fertilizer P rates beyond 20 kg/ha P2O5 in the first and the second (residual) year on both maize and cowpea. The relative effect of each kg of P was higher on maize than on cowpea in the residual year. Yields in the second season were higher from plots where higher P levels were previously applied, with the residual treatments being statistically significant (P<0.05). Total grain yields for the rotation were highest when the P fertilizer was applied to cowpea, followed by maize grown on the residual P and the incorporated cowpea residues.

Media summary

In maize-cowpea farming systems, higher yields are achieved from crop sequences when phosphorus is applied to cowpea in the first season and followed by maize in the second season.

Keywords

Crop sequences, residual phosphorus effects, legumes, maize-cowpea rotations, sandy soils

Introduction

Crop sequences are utilized by the majority of farmers in rural Zimbabwe. Cowpea is a widely grown legume in both the high and low rainfall smallholder farming areas of Zimbabwe (Shumba et al. 1990). Although maize is the staple crop in Zimbabwe, the popularity of cowpea with farmers can be attributed to its multiple uses and its adaptability to different environments. It is often used for relish so it an important source of proteins for humans, as livestock feed, and for enhancing soil fertility through biological N fixation (Giller 2001; Johnson 1970). However, the lack of appropriate fertilizer recommendations, poor seed availability, and a limited product market were identified as major constraints to the expansion of cowpea production in Zimbabwe (Nhamo et al. 2003). The aim of this study was to determine an agronomic rationale for P application rates and strategies in maize-cowpea sequences.

Materials and methods

The experiments were conducted on-farm on sandy soils in two smallholder farming areas of Zimbabwe, Shurugwi and Zimuto, where the average annual rainfall ranges from 450 to 600 mm. Phosphorus was broadcast at rates of 0, 20, 40 and 60 kg/ha of P2O5 on all maize and cowpea plots in the first season. In the second season, the crops were rotated and grown on residual P from the previous year’s application. Nitrogen (60 kg N/ha) was applied to the maize, whilst K was applied in both years to cowpea and maize at 45 kg K/ha. Cowpea residues from the first season were incorporated into the soil, but the maize residues were fed to livestock. Grain yields were measured at the end of each season. The relative P effect was calculated as the ratio of the yield benefit of each P treatment to the control (0P).

Results

Selected properties of the soils at the trial sites are given in Table 1. Most of the soils had a low pH (less than 6.2), low clay and organic matter contents, and hence low total exchangeable bases and CEC. Soils from homestead fields (e.g. at the Maganyani site in Zimuto) had higher nutrient contents than the soils from topland fields in their respective areas.

Table 1. Selected properties of the sandy soils (0-20cm) at the trial sites in Zimbabwe.

Site

PH
(CaCl2)

N
(%)

P
(mg/kg)

Ca

Mg

K

CEC

OC
(g/kg)

Clay
(%)

Sand
(%)

Silt
(%)

Cmol+/kg

Mapfidza (Shg, H)

6.2

0.78

6.2

2.3

0.6

0.02

2.6

10.10

8

88

4

Shanyurai (Shg, T)

4.9

0.56

3.8

1.6

0.4

0.30

1.9

7.20

2

92

6

Shava (Shg, H)

5.2

0.60

5.3

1.5

0.5

0.05

2.0

9.80

2

93

5

Chibango (Zmt, H)

5.9

0.61

4.9

1.8

0.5

0.09

2.2

8.60

5

88

7

Maganyani (Zmt, H)

5.1

0.59

3.6

1.5

0.3

0.10

1.8

7.00

5

89

6

Steama (Zmt, T)

4.8

0.49

2.9

1.0

0.2

0.06

1.3

5.40

4

93

3

Abbreviations: locality; Shg, Shurugwi; Zmt, Zimuto; field type; H, homestead; T, topland.

Cowpea yields from the sites in Zimuto were significantly (P<0.05) higher than those in Shurugwi. However, average yields at each of the regions relative to the country average of 200 kg/ha were high, 816 kg/ha and 1212 kg/ha for Shurugwi and Zimuto, respectively (Tables 2 and 3). Maize yields at Shurugwi (1556 kg/ha) were higher than those at Zimuto (885 kg/ha) in the first season. In the second season, yields of cowpea and maize from the 0P control plots were significantly lower than from the plots that previously received the higher rates of P fertilizer (Tables 4 and 5).

Table 2. Cowpea grain yields (kg/ha) in the first season for application of different P rates in the Shurugwi and Zimuto smallholder farming areas of Zimbabwe.

Site

Cowpea yields at different P rates (kg/ha P2O5)

0

20

40

60

SED

Mapfidza

1389

1521

1678

1675

108

Shanyurai

319

422

459

495

25

Shava

834

866

997

1012

195

Chibango

964

1350

1536

2088

650

Maganyani

1358

1476

1632

1899

325

Steama

466

488

546

737

348

See Table 1 for locality and field type of each site

Table 3. Maize grain yields (kg/ha) in the first season of application of different P levels in the Shurugwi and Zimuto smallholder farming areas of Zimbabwe.

Site

Maize yields at different P rates (kg/ha P2O5)

0

20

40

60

SED

Mapfidza

3318

4038

4320

4760

1524

Shanyurai

618

811

745

987

79

Shava

1430

1655

2038

1651

419

Chibango

1040

1136

1151

1137

446

Maganyani

821

1026

1058

1266

208

Steama

398

495

561

525

125

See Table 1 for locality and field type of each site

Discussion

There was an increase in the total grain yield of both crops over the two years at each site due to the P applied in the first year. In maize, the 0P control received the blanket N and K application and this resulted in yields that were usually not significantly different from the treatments with applied P. However, the rate of N may have been inadequate, and the low yield responses of maize to P at some sites could be a result of N deficiency masking the effects of the applications of P since N is the main limiting nutrient on sandy soils in the Shurugwi and Zimu regions.

Table 4. Cowpea grain yields (kg/ha) in the second season (residual P effects) to the rates of P fertilizer applied in the previous season in the Shurugwi and Zimuto smallholder farming areas of Zimbabwe.

Site

Cowpea yield response to residual P from rates (kg/ha P2O5) applied in previous season

0

20

40

60

SED

Mapfidza

1196

1567

1876

1765

119

Shanyurai

290

513

662

700

39

Shava

624

909

1099

1007

206

Chibango

708

1077

1164

1979

559

Maganyani

1290

1185

1236

1675

327

Steama

333

491

569

963

314

See Table 1 for locality and field type of each site

Table 5. Maize grain yields (kg/ha) in the second season (residual P effects) to the rates of P fertilizer applied in the previous season in the Shurugwi and Zimuto smallholder farming areas of Zimbabwe.

Site

Maize yield response to residual P from rates (kg/ha P2O5) applied in previous season

0

20

40

60

SED

Mapfidza

4482

5154

5212

5984

608.7

Shanyurai

2492

3143

3256

3325

626.9

Shava

4178

4333

5313

5872

769.3

Chibango

821

1238

1265

1280

191.8

Maganyani

980

1199

1387

1400

227

Steama

937

1589

1598

1630

118

See Table 1 for locality and field type of each site

Fertility of different field types

The higher yields of cowpea and maize at Mapfidza, Shava, Chibango and Maganyani reflect the higher fertility of the soils at these homestead sites (Table 1). Homestead fields (those close to the home) are better managed and more fertile than topland fields as they receive additional inputs such as kitchen refuse, composts and ash. However, the higher fertility levels of the homestead fields had the effect of reducing the yield per unit P applied in all the treatments relative to the control.

Nutrient interactions

In crop sequences in Zimbabwe, the major nutrient inflows are a result of nutrient cycling and biological N fixation by legumes. Maize following cowpea benefited from residual fertilizer P, and P and other nutrients from the decomposing above- and below-ground cowpea residues. However, cowpea following maize only benefited from the residual fertilizer P, since most of the maize residues were removed to feed animals and maize does not improve the N budget through N fixation. This effect shows the importance of small applications of P on the crop sequences, as there was a positive correlation between P application rate and the yield responses in both the first and the second year. Hardter et al. (1991) reported higher yields and land-use efficiencies from maize-cowpea sequences following application of both N and P fertilizers. Hence, in these systems management of crop residues can play a significant role in the cycling of nutrients and improvement of the soil fertility (Giller 2001; Kouyate et al. 2000).

Targeting phosphorus application

The major benefit of applying P to cowpea is the increased leaf and root biomass that can be incorporated into the soil. The increased maize yields obtained when planted after cowpea show this effect (Table 5). Eagleton et al. (1991) also found that P application increased both cowpea and maize yields. With the application of N, maize uses more P in the first year, leaving much less residual P in the soil for the subsequent crop, in contrast to cowpea which recycles both P and N. The higher relative P effect obtained with maize following cowpea is a result of the recycling of nutrients from the decomposition of the cowpea biomass.

Conclusions

The application of P to cowpea increases biomass production, and thus the benefit to the following maize crop through the efficient recycling of both N and P. The unit grain to unit P ratio favoured the application of P to cowpea, with the following maize crop benefiting from the residual effects. In maize-cowpea sequences in the Shurugwi and Zimu regions, adding a small amount of P is important, and it is better applied to cowpea than to maize.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported in part by CIMMYT’s Risk Management Project and TSBF-CIAT’s IFAD-funded project.

References

Eagleton GE, Mohamed AA, Odowa AA and Muse HA (1991) A comparison of moisture-conserving practices for traditional sorghum-based cropping system of the Bay Region, in Somalia. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 36, 87-99.

Giller KE (2001) Nitrogen Fixation in Tropical Cropping Systems. (CABI Publishing, Wallingford, UK).

Hardter R, Horst WJ, Schmidt G and Frey E (1991) Yields and landuse efficiency of maize-cowpea crop rotations in comparison to mixed and monocropping on an alfisol in Northen Ghana. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science 166, 326-337.

Johnson DT (1970) The cowpea in the African areas of Rhodesia. Rhodesia Agricultural Journal 67, 61-64.

Kouyate Z, Franzluebbers K, Juo ASR and Hossner LR (2000). Tillage, crop residue, legume rotation and green manure effects on sorghum and millet yields in the semiarid tropics of Mali. Plant and Soil 225, 1414-151.

Nhamo N, Mupangwa W, Siziba S, Gatsi T and Chikazunga D (2003) The role of Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata) among other grain legumes in the management of soil fertility in the smallholder-farming sector of Zimbabwe. (In press)

Shumba EM, Dhliwayo HH, Kupfuma B and Gumbie G (1990) Response of maize in rotation with cowpea to NPK fertilizers in low rainfall area. Zimbabwe Journal Agricultural Research 28, 39-45.

Previous PageTop Of Page